Display reference for gadgets below 200 Euros (~$214). For a price of less than 200 Euros (~$214), the Redmi Indicate 11 features a very fascinating technical configuration. First of all, the very sparkling AMOLED panel collectively with its 90 Hz refresh rate and sparkling calibration is a distinctive promoting level. Read on to discover where customers will have to compromise with the Xiaomi cellphone.
Marcus Herbrich (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 05/26/2022 🇩🇪
Although the Redmi Indicate 11 belongs to the low-priced mid-range, Xiaomi really excels with regards to the display. The most affordable mannequin of the Redmi Indicate 11 sequence, which was introduced in February, has a 6.43-coast AMOLED display with a 90 Hz refresh rate and a maximum brightness of up to 1,000 nits.
Or now not it’s powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 680, which is accompanied by LPDDR4X RAM and UFS 2.2 storage. You can take from the following mannequin variants:
Redmi Indicate 11 | 64 GB | 4 GB RAM | 200 Euro (~$214) (MSRP)
Redmi Indicate 11 | 128 GB | 4 GB RAM | 230 Euro (~$247) (MSRP)
Redmi Indicate 11 | 128 GB | 4 GB RAM | 260 Euro (~$279) (MSRP)
The constructed-in 5,000 mAh battery helps 33-watt fast charging, and an appropriate 33-watt charger is incorporated within the sector. To spherical off the Redmi Indicate 11’s features, there may be a facet-mounted fingerprint sensor and an integrated 3.5 mm audio jack.
Display
6.43 coast 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, modern: certain, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB
, 42.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Vitality Shipping (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (no eFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, OTG, Miracast, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 4G: LTE FDD: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/284G: LTE TDD: 38/40/41, (B41 2535-2655 MHz); 3G: WCDMA:1/2/4/5/82G; GSM: 850 900 1800 1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Dimension
high x width x depth (in mm): 8.09 x 159.87 x 73.87 ( = 0.32 x 6.29 x 2.91 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating Machine
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm) 8 MP (1/4″, 1.12 µm) 2 MP (macro) 2 MP (depth), camera API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1/3.06″, 1.0 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, case, USB cable, charger, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR value: 0.596 W/kg head, 0.956 W/kg body, fanless
Weight
179 g ( = 6.31 oz / 0.39 kilos), Vitality Present: 114 g ( = 4.02 oz / 0.25 kilos)
Indicate: The manufacturer may use parts from varied suppliers collectively with display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating
Date
Mannequin
Weight
Drive
Dimension
Resolution
Easiest Price
79.8 %05/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
SD 680, Adreno 610179 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43″2400×108075.1 %05/2022
Motorola Moto G22
Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50″1600×72080.5 %01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60″2400×108077.6 %05/2022
realme C35
T616, Mali-G57 MP1189 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60″2408×108074.9 %12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50″1600×720
The 179-gram Redmi Indicate 11 is available in three shade alternate suggestions. Although the believe quality is amazingly spectacular for this price range, the Xiaomi cellphone doesn’t feel top rate. Each the back and the frame are made of plastic, which is noticeable. The high-gloss attain of our Star Blue review sample barely hides fingerprints. On the opposite hand, customers who take the black model will catch a satined plastic surface.
The IP53-licensed Redmi cellphone features a flat OLED display at the entrance, which comes with a broad “chin”. On the opposite hand, the competition within the affordable mid-range doesn’t supply a a lot greater ratio between the display and the entrance of the software, both. About 84.5% of the Redmi Indicate 11’s entrance is dedicated to the AMOLED panel.
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Motorola Moto G22 realme C35 Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11 ❌
164 mm / 6.46 coast
75.8 mm / 2.98 coast
8.9 mm / 0.3504 coast
205 g0.4519 lbs164 mm / 6.46 coast
75 mm / 2.95 coast
8.5 mm / 0.3346 coast
185 g0.4079 lbs164.4 mm / 6.47 coast
75.6 mm / 2.98 coast
8.1 mm / 0.3189 coast
189 g0.4167 lbs163.56 mm / 6.44 coast
75.78 mm / 2.98 coast
8.75 mm / 0.3445 coast
195 g0.4299 lbs159.87 mm / 6.29 coast
73.87 mm / 2.91 coast
8.09 mm / 0.3185 coast
179 g0.3946 lbs
Given the price degree of below 200 Euros (~$214), there are no real aspects of criticism for the Redmi Indicate 11 in phrases of connectivity. The software comes with Miracast, UFS storage, a 3.5 mm headphone jack, and an IR blaster. Furthermore, the internal storage can be expanded by up to 1 TB via microSD cards. In addition, external peripherals and storage gadgets can be related via the USB port, nonetheless it most fascinating helps the two.0 standard.
The Redmi Indicate 11 has a triple card slot, which means that two nano SIM cards and one microSD card can be customary in parallel. With our Angelbird V60 reference card, the rate is at a decent degree. The SD card reader gets lawful transfer rates out of our storage medium within the Unpleasant Platform Disk take a look at, and the replica pace of about 25 MB/s is satisfactory as well.
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
47.8 MB/s ∼100% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.74 MB/s ∼52%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s ∼51% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.5 MB/s ∼43% -17%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s ∼32% -37%
05101520253035404550556065707580TooltipXiaomi Redmi Indicate 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.4 (25.6-49.1)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (25-46.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.4 (38.4-81.8)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.5 (58.6-78.9)
Xiaomi combines the Android system with its in-home MIUI client interface on model 13. According to reports, the Redmi Indicate 11 will level-headed be supplied with security updates at 90-day intervals till 2025. Moreover the upcoming upgrade to Android 12, it can level-headed also catch an update to Android 13. We were unable to acquire official information from the manufacturer. At the time of our review, the Xiaomi cellphone is less than date because of the it working Android 11 and security patches from January 2022.
In MIUI 13, the Redmi Indicate 11 makes use of a redesigned MiSans font, a variety of latest widgets, as well as enhance for Google’s “Material You” make. What’s somewhat unnecessary are the ad banners or ads displayed within the MIUI 13 interface, such as when an app is installed. On the opposite hand, these so-called MSA (MIUI Machine Ads) can generally be disabled somewhat easily. The present bloatware, such as games or Netflix, can also be uninstalled.
In the case of communication modules, Xiaomi makes use of an NFC chip for contactless payments via Google Pay as well as Bluetooth 5.0. Furthermore, the Qualcomm chipset within the Redmi Indicate 11 allows accessing the cell Information superhighway over 4G. The X11 modem doesn’t enhance the 5G standard.
The Xiaomi cellphone covers a total of 12 LTE bands and all the relevant LTE frequencies for the German-speaking area, collectively with the LTE Band 20 and the Band 28. On the opposite hand, the budget Redmi mannequin is never instructed for a shuttle abroad, e.g. to america, since it doesn’t have bands 13 and 25.
The Indicate 11 offers solid transfer rates over Wi-Fi 5 networks. In combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the Xiaomi cellphone is on par with the low-priced mid-range competition. Then again, stability is terribly low in our measurements.
Average of class Smartphone
(72.5 – 1736, n=36, last 2 years)
704 MBit/s ∼100% +136%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (305min – 332max) MBit/s ∼46% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
298 (198min – 345max) MBit/s ∼42%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
244 (179min – 255max) MBit/s ∼35% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
(78.3 – 1710, n=36, last 2 years)
716 MBit/s ∼100% +122%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
370 (351min – 376max) MBit/s ∼52% +15%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 (309min – 366max) MBit/s ∼48% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (162min – 386max) MBit/s ∼45%
Average of class Smartphone
(5.59 – 1395, n=229, last 2 years)
479 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 (21min – 65max) MBit/s ∼9%
Average of class Smartphone
(15.5 – 1348, n=229, last 2 years)
467 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.4 (41min – 57max) MBit/s ∼11%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (198-345)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø323 (162-386)
In speak in self assurance to assess the software’s tracking capabilities in practice, we log a route with the Garmin Venu 2 for comparison applications. The Redmi Indicate 11 determines its place via GPS (L1), GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo (E1). The satellite fix initiate air is fast and has an accuracy of about 4 meters. Even indoors, the Xiaomi cellphone determines its place fast and accurately.
The deviations within the path are small, meaning that the routes are usually identical for the mid-range cellphone and the smartwatch. The detailed GPS log reveals minor inaccuracies within the Redmi cellphone, although, especially when changing directions.
The dual-SIM cellphone helps two nano SIM cards as well as VoLTE. Call quality is at a lawful degree, and even in speaker mode, the budget mid-range cellphone allows the participants in a video call to communicate intelligibly.
Selfie taken with the Redmi Indicate 11The 13 MP camera, which is located within the punch gap at the entrance, takes solid selfies in Describe mode. The Samsung S5K3L6 sensor reproduces matters a bit of softly and somewhat dully, and publicity can be greater tuned as well.
The Redmi Indicate 11’s rear-facing quad-camera system consists of a 50 MP main sensor from Samsung (S5KJN1), an 8 MP ultra broad-angle lens, as well as two 2 MP sensors for macro and depth photographs. The Samsung ISOCELL JN1 has a sensor dimension of 1/2.76 inches, and it has an aperture of f/1.8 within the Redmi Indicate 11. By default, photographs are taken in pixel-binning mode, so the images are 12.5 MP instead of 50 MP.
The outcomes are extra than decent for this price range – we really appreciate the photographs taken with the affordable mid-range cellphone in very lawful light conditions in particular. The colors are also compelling with a entertaining nonetheless now not over-saturated representation. We can’t resolve any major deviations (DeltaE deviations >10) in our measurement with the ColorChecker Passport. On the opposite hand, image sharpness suffers with very distant matters, and the dynamic range is rather low as well. Clear compromises have to be made in low light, although matters are rendered great sharper than with varied smartphones in this price range that are geared up with the Samsung ISOCELL JN1.
With a area of survey of 118 levels, a lot of image protest material can be captured with the ultra broad-angle lens that contains the GalaxyCore GC08A3 sensor. On the opposite hand, we glimpse a lot of room for enchancment in phrases of quality here. The photographs have many image errors, and the sharpness degree is low. Then again, the quality of the ultra broad-angle lens is level-headed a bit of above average for this price range.
Videos can most fascinating be recorded at up to 30 fps in Rotund HD quality with the Indicate 11 – here’s a limitation of the Snapdragon 680, which doesn’t enhance a UHD choice. On the opposite hand, the software’s heart-broken stabilization doesn’t exactly make the Xiaomi cellphone suitable for recording videos, both. Switching between the broad-angle and ultra broad-angle lens when filming is never doable with the Redmi cellphone.
Image Comparison
Grasp a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the place on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a original window. The first image reveals the scaled photograph of the take a look at software.
Vast angleWide angleLow lightUltra-broad angle5x zoom
click to load images
5.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11: 5.35 ∆E min: 1.97 – max: 8.65 ∆E29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11: 47.18 ∆E min: 13.46 – max: 93.71 ∆E
The Redmi Indicate 11’s 33-watt chargerThe low-priced mid-range cellphone comes with a modular 33-watt charger, a data and charging cable, a case, a SIM pin, and a Posthaste Start e book with warranty conditions. In addition, a display conceal protector comes installed by default.
The manufacturer grants a 12-month warranty on its cellphone.
The capacitive touchscreen detects inputs fast and with precision, and the Gorilla Glass 3’s gliding properties are equally compelling. At the same time, the constructed-in AMOLED panel is responsive with a sampling rate of up to 180 Hz, whereas it offers a refresh rate of 90 Hz, which makes animations and scrolling survey pleasingly gentle.
An active fingerprint scanner that is integrated into the energy button affords biometric security. It operates fast and delivers lawful recognition rates. Unlocking the software with facial recognition via the entrance-facing camera is valid as fast, nonetheless this 2D methodology is less stable.
Subpixel gridThe Redmi Indicate 11’s 6.43-coast Dot Display is based on AMOLED know-how. You can station its refresh rate to both 60 or 90 Hz. Adaptive management, such as the one seen in flagships, is now not available here.
The Chinese manufacturer doesn’t officially advertise an HDR10 certification, nonetheless according to the “DRM Data” app, the OLED panel, which has a decision of 2400×1080 pixels, helps HDR protest material. Brooding about the brightness of 1,010 cd/m² (APL18) that we measured, customers ought to level-headed also take advantage of this. Utilizing a totally white background, the Xiaomi cellphone manages a peak brightness of 702 cd/m², which is valid as outstanding in this price range. The very even brightness distribution of the Dot Display is also value citing.
Because of its know-how, the Redmi Indicate 11 makes use of pulse width modulation (PWM) at a low frequency of 90 to 171 Hz for brightness management. The OLED flickering within the Xiaomi smartphone starts at 55% of the maximum brightness and runs at a constant 90 Hz with a very low and even amplitude curve. We didn’t acquire a DC dimming mode within the settings menu.
694
cd/m²691
cd/m²700
cd/m²697
cd/m²702
cd/m²708
cd/m²705
cd/m²706
cd/m²703
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Ceremony i1Pro 3
Maximum: 708 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 700.7 cd/m² Minimal: 2.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 702 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Coloration 1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
OLED, 2400×1080, 6.43Motorola Moto G22
IPS LCD, 1600×720, 6.50Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400×1080, 6.60realme C35
IPS, 2408×1080, 6.60Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
IPS LCD, 1600×720, 6.50Brightness middle702
451
-36%
504
-28%
585
-17%
446
-36%
Brightness701
431
-39%
499
-29%
558
-20%
423
-40%
Brightness Distribution98
90
-8%
91
-7%
89
-9%
88
-10%
Black Level *0.5
0.72
0.6
0.29
Colorchecker dE 2000 *1
5.82
-482%
3.3
-230%
4.4
-340%
4.94
-394%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.3
9.3
-304%
6
-161%
8.77
-281%
8.81
-283%
Greyscale dE 2000 *1.4
5
-257%
4.1
-193%
5.9
-321%
5.1
-264%
Gamma2.2 100%
2.776 79%
2.28 96%
2.228 99%
2.145 103%
CCT6520 100%
7683 85%
7041 92%
8001 81%
7890 82%
Contrast902
700
975
1538
… smaller is finest
Cloak Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹ
To dim the display conceal, some notebooks will merely cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a methodology called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency ought to level-headed ideally be undetectable to the human discover. If said frequency is too low, customers with delicate eyes may abilities strain or headaches or even search for the flickering altogether.
Cloak flickering / PWM detected 171.4 HzThe display backlight sparkles at 171.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 171.4 Hz is relatively low, so delicate customers will probably search for flickering and abilities eyestrain at the stated brightness environment and beneath.
In comparison: 52 % of all examined gadgets halt now not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21913 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.
Sequence of measurements with a fastened zoom degree and varied brightness settings
In the case of the display, the Redmi Indicate 11 doesn’t lack any configuration alternate suggestions. Users can take from three varied profiles and customise the coloration temperature to their personal taste. On the opposite hand, individual display parameters, such as saturation or gamma, can’t be tweaked.
In our assessments with the CalMAN software and a spectrophotometer, the AMOLED panel proves to be very well calibrated, and it hardly reveals any shade deviations within the “Standard” profile. Because of the OLED know-how, where individual pixels can be totally switched off, an “absolute” black is achieved, and contrast (theoretically) tends towards infinity.
Display Response Timesℹ
Display response times display how fast the display conceal is able to change from one shade to the following. Gradual response times can lead to afterimages and can cause titillating objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles ought to level-headed pay special attention to fast response times.
Thanks to the high brightness, the Redmi Indicate 11 is also optimally geared up for everyday use initiate air. On the opposite hand, the automatic brightness feature wants to be activated here. Otherwise, the Xiaomi cellphone stops at 445 cd/m2. Cloak protest material remains legible even in yelp sunlight and below the accompanying reflections on the glass surface.
The AMOLED panel’s viewing-angle stability is amazingly lawful, and most fascinating at very flat viewing angles is a diminutive brightness loss noticeable.
A Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 powers the Redmi Indicate 11. The SoC, which has been manufactured in a 6 nm activity, has four Cortex-A73 cores (2.4 GHz) and four Cortex-A53 cores (1.8 GHz). An Adreno 610 is integrated as graphics unit.
The Redmi cellphone ranks at the back of the Poco M4 Pro in our benchmark package, although the latter also has a bit extra RAM at its disposal. Compared with its sibling mannequin, the one-core rates in Geekbench in particular flip out to be decrease.
Average of class Smartphone
(58 – 1755, n=258, last 2 years)
652 Facets ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Facets ∼92% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Facets ∼59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
(374 – 384, n=2)
379 Facets ∼58% -1%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
374 Facets ∼57% -3%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Facets ∼46% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
178 Facets ∼27% -54%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
172 Facets ∼26% -55%
Average of class Smartphone
(248 – 4914, n=258, last 2 years)
2147 Facets ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Facets ∼84% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Facets ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
(1557 – 1738, n=2)
1648 Facets ∼77% -5%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1557 Facets ∼73% -10%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1184 Facets ∼55% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1087 Facets ∼51% -37%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
947 Facets ∼44% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
(4436 – 18567, n=134, last 2 years)
10135 Facets ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Facets ∼93% +22%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8730 Facets ∼86% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
(7694 – 8730, n=2)
8212 Facets ∼81% +7%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8066 Facets ∼80% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Facets ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5739 Facets ∼57% -25%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4922 Facets ∼49% -36%
Average of class Smartphone
(895 – 8124, n=176, last 2 years)
4137 Facets ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Facets ∼79% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2738 Facets ∼66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2738 Facets ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1637 Facets ∼40% -40%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1226 Facets ∼30% -55%
Average of class Smartphone
(1542 – 19657, n=176, last 2 years)
7348 Facets ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Facets ∼87% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5794 Facets ∼79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
5794 Facets ∼79% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3345 Facets ∼46% -42%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2565 Facets ∼35% -56%
Average of class Smartphone
(1012 – 9044, n=176, last 2 years)
4762 Facets ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Facets ∼96% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3824 Facets ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
3824 Facets ∼80% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1836 Facets ∼39% -52%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1210 Facets ∼25% -68%
Average of class Smartphone
(478 – 25642, n=176, last 2 years)
7030 Facets ∼100% +222%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Facets ∼42% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2183 Facets ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2183 Facets ∼31% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1263 Facets ∼18% -42%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1017 Facets ∼14% -53%
Average of class Smartphone
(718 – 2392, n=176, last 2 years)
1376 Facets ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Facets ∼97% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Facets ∼87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
1199 Facets ∼87% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
947 Facets ∼69% -21%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
718 Facets ∼52% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
(4293 – 286905, n=122, last 2 years)
63365 Facets ∼100% +1169%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Facets ∼14% +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4995 Facets ∼8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
(4852 – 4995, n=2)
4924 Facets ∼8% -1%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4852 Facets ∼8% -3%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
4725 Facets ∼7% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4453 Facets ∼7% -11%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4323 Facets ∼7% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
(1555 – 68880, n=57, last 2 years)
12864 Facets ∼100% +165%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6400 Facets ∼50% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4853 Facets ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
(4370 – 4853, n=2)
4612 Facets ∼36% -5%
realme 9i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4370 Facets ∼34% -10%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
4209 Facets ∼33% -13%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2514 Facets ∼20% -48%
The Redmi Indicate 11 also performs solidly within the graphics benchmarks. Although the Poco M4 Pro occasionally ratings twice as high with its Dimensity 810, the Snapdragon 680 level-headed performs satisfactorily in relation to the comparison area.
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Facets ∼100% +181%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
126 Facets ∼36% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 Facets ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
117 Facets ∼34% -6%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
112 Facets ∼32% -10%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Facets ∼100% +183%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
129 Facets ∼36% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Facets ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
116 Facets ∼32% -9%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
108 Facets ∼30% -15%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1210 Facets ∼100% +178%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
464 Facets ∼38% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
435 Facets ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
426 Facets ∼35% -2%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
417 Facets ∼34% -4%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1235 Facets ∼100% +176%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
463 Facets ∼37% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
447 Facets ∼36%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
446 Facets ∼36% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
428 Facets ∼35% -4%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Facets ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2882 Facets ∼100% +21%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2628 Facets ∼91% +11%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2492 Facets ∼86% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Facets ∼82%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2145 Facets ∼74% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2098 Facets ∼73% -12%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2396 Facets ∼100% +107%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Facets ∼48%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1138 Facets ∼47% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
919 Facets ∼38% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
839 Facets ∼35% -27%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
584 Facets ∼24% -49%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2489 Facets ∼100% +99%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1294 Facets ∼52% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1253 Facets ∼50%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1074 Facets ∼43% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Facets ∼38% -24%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
657 Facets ∼26% -48%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3804 Facets ∼100% +48%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3036 Facets ∼80% +18%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2683 Facets ∼71% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2573 Facets ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2109 Facets ∼55% -18%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Facets ∼34% -50%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2570 Facets ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Facets ∼47%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1185 Facets ∼46% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
939 Facets ∼37% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
736 Facets ∼29% -39%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
460 Facets ∼18% -62%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2770 Facets ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1372 Facets ∼50%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1353 Facets ∼49% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1109 Facets ∼40% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
867 Facets ∼31% -37%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
536 Facets ∼19% -61%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3553 Facets ∼100% +34%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2957 Facets ∼83% +11%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2812 Facets ∼79% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2654 Facets ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2048 Facets ∼58% -23%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1250 Facets ∼35% -53%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3846 Facets ∼100% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1995 Facets ∼52%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1994 Facets ∼52% 0%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1471 Facets ∼38% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1126 Facets ∼29% -44%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
722 Facets ∼19% -64%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3777 Facets ∼100% +79%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2132 Facets ∼56% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2113 Facets ∼56%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1656 Facets ∼44% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Facets ∼34% -39%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
797 Facets ∼21% -62%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2714 Facets ∼100% +99%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1365 Facets ∼50%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1332 Facets ∼49% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1103 Facets ∼41% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
863 Facets ∼32% -37%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
453 Facets ∼17% -67%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Facets ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1188 Facets ∼47%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1159 Facets ∼46% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
935 Facets ∼37% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
738 Facets ∼29% -38%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
383 Facets ∼15% -68%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3529 Facets ∼100% +32%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2959 Facets ∼84% +10%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2789 Facets ∼79% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2683 Facets ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2031 Facets ∼58% -24%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1265 Facets ∼36% -53%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3965 Facets ∼100% +90%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2166 Facets ∼55% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2085 Facets ∼53%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1710 Facets ∼43% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1273 Facets ∼32% -39%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
921 Facets ∼23% -56%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4014 Facets ∼100% +108%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2046 Facets ∼51% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1931 Facets ∼48%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1518 Facets ∼38% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1142 Facets ∼28% -41%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
851 Facets ∼21% -56%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3801 Facets ∼100% +47%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3063 Facets ∼81% +18%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2722 Facets ∼72% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Facets ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2032 Facets ∼53% -22%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1292 Facets ∼34% -50%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps ∼66%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33 fps ∼59% -11%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps ∼52% -22%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼41% -38%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps ∼100% +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps ∼64%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼62% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼39% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps ∼36% -43%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼33% -48%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps ∼78% +65%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼56% +18%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps ∼50% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼47%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼39% -18%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼100% +100%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼55% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼40% -20%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼40% -20%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼30% -40%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼100% +77%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼83% +46%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps ∼61% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼57%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼52% -8%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps ∼38% -33%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼62%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼62% 0%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps ∼38% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps ∼36% -41%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps ∼29% -53%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼85% +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps ∼56%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.1 fps ∼55% -3%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps ∼42% -26%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼38% -32%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼100% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps ∼54%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.2 fps ∼51% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼38% -30%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps ∼37% -31%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps ∼22% -59%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼75% +40%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.1 fps ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼54%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps ∼54% 0%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.4 fps ∼37% -32%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps ∼100% +94%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.3 fps ∼53% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps ∼35% -31%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.2 fps ∼35% -31%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps ∼24% -53%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼73% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps ∼59%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.6 fps ∼57% -2%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼47% -20%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps ∼36% -39%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼100% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.8 fps ∼58%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.7 fps ∼57% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.2 fps ∼36% -37%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps ∼36% -38%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4 fps ∼24% -59%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
959 Facets ∼100% +184%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
386 Facets ∼40% +14%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
348 Facets ∼36% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
338 Facets ∼35%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
201 Facets ∼21% -41%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24.03 (7.17min – 39.18max) fps ∼100% +112%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14.45 (5.13min – 43.77max) fps ∼60% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11.34 (7.21min – 29.04max) fps ∼47%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25.78 (8.99min – 41.58max) fps ∼100% +104%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashXiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12.63 (8.82min – 26.42max) fps ∼49%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.12 (3min – 25.95max) fps ∼35% -28%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25.82 (9.11min – 45.85max) fps ∼100% +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13.74 (7.59min – 40.96max) fps ∼53%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashMotorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC FlashXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29.57 (10.34min – 49.42max) fps ∼100% +152%
realme 9i
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashXiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11.75 (6.45min – 34.52max) fps ∼40%
The Redmi Indicate 11 runs smoothly extra usually than now not in everyday use, nonetheless minor stuttering is always demonstrate. Machine performance is absolutely beautiful for this price range, and application load times are also pleasingly short. This is also because of the the moderate read and write rates supplied by the united statesstorage. The write rates in particular are very lawful within the Redmi Indicate 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11Motorola Moto G22Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5Grealme C35Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FAverage 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone Sequential Read 256KB895.34
215.45
-76%
964
8%
907.1
1%
302.3
-66%
771 ?(511 – 907, n=3)
-14%
895 ?(45.6 – 2037, n=255, last 2 years)
0%
Sequential Write 256KB519.23
112.78
-78%
471
-9%
271.1
-48%
74.5
-86%
304 ?(120.6 – 519, n=3)
-41%
437 ?(11.9 – 1465, n=255, last 2 years)
-16%
Random Read 4KB172.95
39.32
-77%
148.8
-14%
137.8
-20%
77.8
-55%
133.1 ?(88.5 – 173, n=3)
-23%
159.6 ?(13.5 – 325, n=255, last 2 years)
-8%
Random Write 4KB163.29
16.34
-90%
171.8
5%
206.4
26%
47.21
-71%
155 ?(95.4 – 206, n=3)
-5%
151.6 ?(221 – 449, n=256, last 2 years)
-7%
Although the constructed-in Adreno 610 is a bit outdated, the graphics performance, which we examined with our partner GameBench, wants to be adequate for the occasional Android game.
PUBG Mobile can most fascinating be played at minimum details – the HD and UHD settings can’t be chosen – nonetheless the shooter is displayed at a relatively constant 25 fps. 30 fps can be achieved the use of the lowest detail settings.
Armajet, our 2nd take a look at game, is also restricted to 30 fps, which is a bit beautiful because the arena shooter theoretically helps 144 fps, and varied smartphones with the Adreno 610, such as the realme 9i, manage 60 fps. The situation is finest in League of Legends: Wild Rift, where a frame rate of 60 fps is doable with the Redmi Indicate 11. Aside from for a solid dip in Armajet, each games are rendered without major FPS fluctuations.
051015202530354045505560Tooltip; Armajet: Ø29.1 (2-31)
; League of Legends: Wild Rift: Ø60 (50-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Comfortable: Ø29.9 (28-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø24.8 (19-26)
The Redmi Indicate 11 doesn’t suffer from heat model. The case’s surface temperatures are hardly value citing in idle usage as well as below load. We measure a maximum of 33 °C (~91 °F) for the Xiaomi cellphone.
We also take a look at the Snapdragon 680’s stability with the GFX benchmark’s stress take a look at, which repeats the corresponding OpenGL ES 3.1 scenario 30 times in a row. Afterwards, the Indicate 11 has to gift its capabilities within the 3DMark stress assessments.
The Qualcomm SoC’s performance most fascinating throttles minimally in each take a look at scenarios – nonetheless the Wild Life Grievous stress take a look at may now not be done. As a result, we can’t resolve a decrease in frame rates below high load.
32.8 °C
91 F32.4 °C
90 F32.1 °C
90 F 32.3 °C
90 F31.1 °C
88 F31.9 °C
89 F 31.4 °C
89 F32 °C
90 F29.6 °C
85 F
Maximum: 32.8 °C = 91 F
Average: 31.7 °C = 89 F
29.6 °C
85 F30.7 °C
87 F30.9 °C
88 F28.6 °C
83 F31 °C
88 F31.6 °C
89 F28.7 °C
84 F30.3 °C
87 F30.7 °C
87 F
Maximum: 31.6 °C = 89 F
Average: 30.2 °C = 86 F Vitality Present (max.) 26.9 °C = 80 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper facet below maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the gadgets within the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper facet is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper facet is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the software average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
The Redmi Indicate 11 is supplied with a dual-speaker system that affords a sufficiently loud sound in addition to a stereo feeling – we measure a maximum volume of 89 dB. Furthermore, our measurements display a solid frequency response for the Redmi cellphone’s mid and high tones. Bass is never really demonstrate within the sound pattern. Then again, there may be level-headed nothing to complain about for this price range.
The same is valid for the audio abilities via wireless or wired headphones. The Indicate 11 has a 3.5-millimeter audio jack that allows for a replica with extra bass, and the noise degree is within a lawful range with an SNR value of 80 dBFS. In addition to the jack, the software also features Bluetooth 5.0 with SBC, AAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, as well as with the LDAC and LHDC codecs.
dB(A)
0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.436.6252828.23132.625.44027.728503437.8632725.48023.625.910022.328.612517.730.516016.145.320012.845.225013.150.73151257.3400960.85001168.463010.771.180010.374.4100010.973.7125012.176.4160011.878.620001278.9250011.878.4315011.977.7400012.978.7500013.379.7630013.478800013.572.71000013.670.71250014.868.61600014.161.2SPL24.689N0.676.6median 12.8median 71.1Delta1.112.735.93326.426.123.723.526.926.831.732.323.228.721.222.41826.413.930.716.141.411.740.912.246.79.350.69.153.39.259.79.758.910.663.510.970.911.970.61271.212.674.412.776.712.179.212.682.413.382.913.278.613.674.313.77313.670.613.666.324.489.30.569.3median 12.6median 70.61.511.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Indicate 11Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GFrequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare gadgets)
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on average 28.2% decrease than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids – most fascinating 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(±) | greater highs – on average 5.6% greater than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% inequity to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all examined gadgets in this class were greater, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The finest had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all gadgets examined
» 45% of all examined gadgets were greater, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The finest had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on average 31.1% decrease than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(±) | decreased mids – on average 6.4% decrease than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(±) | greater highs – on average 7.6% greater than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% inequity to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all examined gadgets in this class were greater, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The finest had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all gadgets examined
» 63% of all examined gadgets were greater, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The finest had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
The Redmi smartphone has a 5,000 mAh battery that can be absolutely recharged in about 70 minutes with the incorporated 33-watt charger and MMT know-how, where two charging currents tear with the circulation in parallel.
The idle energy consumption level-headed wants a bit of optimization. At almost 2 watts, the Indicate 11 consumes a relatively high amount of energy for a 6.43-coast smartphone. Under load, then again, energy consumption is amazingly low, especially brooding about the high brightness.
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
5000 mAhMotorola Moto G22
5000 mAhXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
Average of class Smartphone
Idle Minimal *1.06
0.9
15%
0.51
52%
1.4
-32%
1.06
-0%
0.914 ?(0.12 – 2.5, n=200, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Average *1.93
1.2
38%
1.96
-2%
1.9
2%
1.93
-0%
1.698 ?(0.65 – 3.6, n=200, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *1.96
1.5
23%
2.01
-3%
2.1
-7%
1.96
-0%
1.926 ?(0.69 – 4, n=200, last 2 years)
2%
Load Average *2.87
4.5
-57%
3.86
-34%
3.8
-32%
2.87
-0%
4.47 ?(2.1 – 7.74, n=200, last 2 years)
-56%
Load Maximum *3.85
5.2
-35%
5.62
-46%
5.6
-45%
3.85
-0%
7.32 ?(3.56 – 11.9, n=200, last 2 years)
-90%
… smaller is finest
012345TooltipXiaomi Redmi Indicate 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.11 (2.88-3.5)
The Xiaomi cellphone’s battery runtimes are at a lawful degree, nonetheless the comparison gadgets of our low-priced mid-range software last a bit longer overall. They can be compared the appropriate by the use of an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m².
With a refresh rate of 90 Hz, the Redmi Indicate 11 manages over 14 hours in our Wi-Fi take a look at and almost 18 hours within the video take a look at. This places the Xiaomi cellphone at the back of its Poco M4 Pro sibling mannequin, nonetheless our comparison gadgets construct at a similar degree.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 101)
14h 02min
Vast Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 49min
Pros+ great OLED panel working at 90 Hz
+ solid features
+ lawful battery existence
+ dual speakers
Cons- moderate performance
– software (ads, outdated security updates, no Android 12)
– 4G standard most fascinating with few LTE bands
With the Redmi Indicate 11, Xiaomi has managed to believe a solid entry-degree smartphone with a focal level on a very sparkling and excellently calibrated OLED display for this price range. The Redmi Cellphone can’t be described as a performance monster because of the the constructed-in Snapdragon 680, nonetheless the thoroughly satisfactory performance in everyday use impressed us. Users having a search for extra performance reserves – especially within the graphics department – ought to level-headed take a survey at our review of the Poco M4 Pro sibling mannequin with its Dimensity 810, in particular since it also offers 5G enhance.
With a latest price of about 170 Euros (~$180), investors of the Redmi Indicate 11 may now not tear contaminated – getting extra smartphone for the cash can be challenging.
In addition to the great display, the Redmi Indicate 11 ratings aspects with a dual-speaker system, lawful features, low heat model, and aggressive battery runtimes. Furthermore, the 5,000 mAh battery can be charged somewhat fast with the incorporated 33-watt energy adapter.
Users who are having a search for longer battery existence in an affordable mid-range cellphone that also has an OIS camera system will acquire an fascinating alternative within the Motorola Moto G41.
Xiaomi Redmi Indicate 11
–
05/20/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Games Performance
15 / 64 → 23%
Application Performance
64 / 86 → 74%
Smartphone – Weighted Average
I have always been very passionately eager about cell technologies, especially smartphones. Being a tech enthusiast means the half-lifetime of my gadgets isn’t exactly long, and being the latest hardware is now not ample to suffice as the manufacturer and operating system play a minor position – probably the most important aspect for me is that the software is state-of-the-art. After posting for Mobi Take a look at I joined Notebookcheck in 2016, where I have been pursuing my enthusiasm for know-how by reviewing the latest smartphone, tablet, and accessory trends.
Translator: Stephanie Chamberlain – Translator – 516 articles revealed on Notebookcheck since 2020
I have been fascinated with know-how ever since I bought my very first Android smartphone, which was somewhat a whereas ago. The energy packed into such a small footprint level-headed amazes me. Learning to program made my understanding of know-how deeper, and at the same time, it expanded my hobby to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to take pleasure in reading and watching opinions of latest gadgets, and that’s how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately discovered their opinions to be very comprehensive, and thankfully, I’ve even had the chance of translating them since 2019. In the case of the substantial area of know-how, I’m at the moment also eager about specializing in Java programming.
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-05-26 (Update: 2022-05-26)
